@article {878,
	title = {The Evolution of the Digital Parliament: Enabling Technologies, Research Gaps, and Future Directions},
	journal = {Information},
	volume = {17},
	year = {2026},
	pages = {633},
	abstract = {<p>The evolution of digital technologies is reshaping parliaments worldwide, driving fundamental changes in their operations. Parliaments, being traditionally conservative institutions, typically lean toward {\textquotedblleft}mature{\textquotedblright} emerging or disruptive technologies through cautious, incremental digital transformation attempts, resulting in complex digital parliamentary environments for their users, processes, systems, and tools. The paper employs an integrative literature review as its methodological tool, examining the concept of the {\textquotedblleft}digital parliament{\textquotedblright} and the technologies that enable it. Using a PRISMA-informed methodology as a guide, we conducted an integrative review covering the period 2006{\textendash}2025, and in this context, we retrieved 535 publications, screened 260, thoroughly examined 57, and analyzed and synthesized 34 studies addressing digital parliamentary technologies, digital platforms, and cooperative workspaces. We found that while specific parliamentary technology (ParlTech) applications{\textemdash}including big data analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), and hybrid parliamentary tools{\textemdash}are reaching institutional maturity, the concept of a digital parliament remains fragmented, lacking a unified definitional and operational framework. Key research gaps have been identified concerning user classification, the digitization of parliamentary functions, operations, and processes, as well as the institutionalization of cooperation platforms. Based on these findings, we propose strategic directions toward establishing a responsible, inclusive, and evidence-based digital parliament. This research contributes as a guideline for parliamentary organizations seeking to create, retain, and disseminate public value through the responsible adoption of emerging digital technologies.</p>
},
	keywords = {cooperative technology platforms, digital institutionalization, digital parliament, digital transformation, hybrid, parliamentary digital environment, ParlTech, PRISMA},
	issn = {2078-2489},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.3390/info17070633},
	author = {Koryzis, Dimitris and Spiliotopoulos, Dimitris and Margaris, Dionisis and Vassilakis, Costas and Fitsilis, Fotios}
}
@article {818,
	title = {Disruptive Technologies for Parliaments: A Literature Review},
	journal = {Future Internet},
	volume = {15},
	year = {2023},
	month = {feb},
	pages = {66},
	abstract = {<p>Exploitation and use of disruptive technologies, such as the Internet of Things, recommender systems, and artificial intelligence, with an ambidextrous balance, are a challenge, nowadays. Users of the technologies, and stakeholders, could be part of a new organisational model that affects business procedures and processes. Additionally, the use of inclusive participatory organisational models is essential for the effective adoption of these technologies. Such models aim to transform organisational structures, as well. Public organisations, such as the parliament, could utilise information systems{\textquoteright} personalisation techniques. As there are a lot of efforts to define the framework, the methodology, the techniques, the platforms, and the suitable models for digital technologies adoption in public organisations, this paper aims to provide a literature review for disruptive technology inclusive use in parliaments. The review emphasises the assessment of the applicability of the technologies, their maturity and usefulness, user acceptance, their performance, and their correlation to the adoption of relevant innovative, inclusive organisational models. It is argued that the efficient digital transformation of democratic institutions, such as parliaments, with the use of advanced e-governance tools and disruptive technologies, requires strategic approaches for adoption, acceptance, and inclusive service adaptation.</p>
},
	keywords = {artificial intelligence, digital transformation, inclusiveness, Internet of Things, parliament, Recommender Systems},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15020066},
	url = {https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/2/66},
	author = {Dimitris Koryzis and Dionisis Margaris and Costas Vassilakis and Konstantinos Kotis and Dimitris Spiliotopoulos}
}
